Compare it to last year's Call of Duty: Black Ops 3, or even last week's Titanfall 2, and it seems ludicrous. There just isn't five-and-a-half hours' worth of game in it.There just isn't five-and-a-half hours' worth of game in it. But prior to that final third, it feels like it's going on forever. In the final act, the action plays at a pace and tempo that few games can manage the way Call of Duty does. Sadly, at five-and-a-half hours long, Infinite Warfare is just starting to feel good when it ends. Those energy weapons shred through the robots which litter the rear half of the campaign, and the pace picks up again as you careen towards the ending.
The tools to smooth out the combat are right there, but Infinite Warfare doesn't want to let us use them.Īs the story continues and your weapons get better, these problems solve themselves. But you spend most of your time without access to the stand-out heavy weapons (or without the ammunition to use them), which further increased my annoyance with the bullet-spongey enemies. Energy rifles, arcing laser cannons, and self-targeting shotguns demonstrate clever weapon design. Items like the Seeker drones and ATADs (automated robots designed to find your enemies and kill them) give you oodles of power while also feeling futuristic. The tools to smooth out the combat are right there, but Infinite Ward doesn't want to let us use them.There's a wealth of weaponry and gadgetry available, but it's drip-fed to you at an unsatisfying pace throughout the campaign. On higher difficulties, it's safer to just wait behind cover until you’re regenerated and then charge back into action than to risk being beaned while leaning, rendering the cover system moot. A cover-leaning system allows you to duck out without fully exposing yourself, but you still take a significant amount of damage as you acquire targets and shoot them – once to remove their helmet and again to put them down. Too many enemies are armoured, increasing that TTK and forcing you to wait behind cover as you wear them down, slowing things dramatically. Low time-to-kill (TTK) is one of the factors that creates the signature pace of the series, but Infinite Warfare messes with that. This is a problem, because one of the few things Call of Duty can typically be counted on to deliver is the feel of a good shooter. This is at its worst when you're shooting early on, because the ballistic weapons you start out with do too little damage to people in space. It acts like it wants to be a serious sci-fi story without giving up the dream of also being Star Wars. This is an action-movie universe where sound travels through space with ease, prolonged exposure to open space is survivable, and you can collide with things at hypervelocity without disintegrating.
Corey's The Expanse series, but it lacks the attention to detail necessary to make the science in the fiction stick. This is an action-movie universe where sound travels through space.Consistency is an issue which repeats itself throughout Infinite Warfare as it works hard to build out its Earth-versus-wayward-colonies fiction. Infinite Warfare contorts itself in an effort to nail that gung-ho, “Ooh-Rah” militaristic tone closely associated with the Call of Duty series, despite the science-fiction setting. The cast commit to their roles wholeheartedly.īeing that the SDF are literally freedom-haters and you are Joe America, it is your job to find and dismantle them, once and for all. And when he's best friends with E3N (or Ethan) in the next mission for unconvincing reasons, he sells that as well.
Youtube com call of duty infinite warfare gameplay android#
For example, Staff Sergeant Omar (David Harewood of Homeland) sells his hatred of the robot E3N (Jeffrey Nordling from 24) like an android screwed him over on the Nostromo. The dialogue is well written, even if the plot itself fails to make sense at times. The entire cast works hard to keep you invested in the story.
0 kommentar(er)
